Sign Up For Sexy Emails

FACEBOOK

Like

INSIDE

Advertising

Don Draper

Betty Draper

Smoking

Fashion

Booze

Mad Men Bookshelf

Current Events

Frank O'Hara

Art

Peggy

Decor

Mad Men Movie Club

Playlist

John Cheever

Illustrators

BOOK CONTRIBUTORS

Alex Balk, Smoker

Carol Diehl, Art Critic

Matthew Gallaway , Novelist

Megan Lubaszka, Architect 

Angela Serratore, Historian

Tim Siedell, Ad Man

Natasha Simons, Writer

Christina Perry & Derrick Gee, Designers

Dave Wilkie, Ad Man


PALS

A Continuous Lean

A Modernist

Ad Rants

The Awl

Bad Banana 

Basket of Kisses

Charlie Allen

Dyna Moe

Illustration Art

Ivy Style

Make The Logo Bigger

Mid-Century Home Style 

My Vintage Vogue

Mid-Century Illustrated

Today's Inspiration

June 15, 2010
Hey! Red won the Tony for Best Play!
It’s a marvelous work about our favorite Resident Tortured Haunted Genius Painter: Mark Rothko.

The play is set in 1958, in Rothko’s New York studio where he is at work on set of massive murals commissioned by the Four Season’s hotel. Under the watchful gaze of his new assistant, the two argue about art, commercialism, success, failure, and all sorts of fascinating creative dilemmas. After all, Rothko had received one the largest comissions the New York art world had seen to paint pictures for a hotel’s high end restaurant. The moral quandrys abound!

Good plays about inspired works of art make for damn fine writing. Here is, by far, one the best description’s of Rothko’s work I’ve read to date. William Boyd, Independent

“Rothko’s paintings display, in the jargon of the art world, “frontality”. There is no attempt to violate the two-dimensional plane – no depth, no perspective; any semi-figurative explanation is robustly prohibited (no empty beach and sky, no cloudscape, here). All evaluation of this type of pure abstract art is reduced to one’s reaction and appreciation – or not – of the colour tones and relationships and the compositional balance or imbalance of the respective blocks of colour. There is nothing wrong with this: pure abstraction, if it is to be appreciated correctly, has to be judged on the strict terms it offers the viewer. To say “that was the colour of the wall in my bedroom when I was a sick child”, or “to me blue equals misery”, or “that reminds me of a sunset in Crete” is redundant. But in Rothko’s case that was never enough. A bombastic, opinionated intellectual, Rothko wanted his simple, extremely beautiful paintings to be freighted with mythic, portentous significance – to be about the despair at the heart of the human condition, doom, entropy, the void and oblivion. Undertaking the Four Seasons commission, he famously declared that he wanted to put all the rich bastards dining there off their food.”


Rothko, ultimately too disturbed by notion of his high-minded work being displayed in a such a banal setting like a restaurant, decided to give back the $35,000 he was paid and refused to have his paintings hung.

Hey! Red won the Tony for Best Play!

It’s a marvelous work about our favorite Resident Tortured Haunted Genius Painter: Mark Rothko.

The play is set in 1958, in Rothko’s New York studio where he is at work on set of massive murals commissioned by the Four Season’s hotel. Under the watchful gaze of his new assistant, the two argue about art, commercialism, success, failure, and all sorts of fascinating creative dilemmas. After all, Rothko had received one the largest comissions the New York art world had seen to paint pictures for a hotel’s high end restaurant. The moral quandrys abound!

Good plays about inspired works of art make for damn fine writing. Here is, by far, one the best description’s of Rothko’s work I’ve read to date. William Boyd, Independent

“Rothko’s paintings display, in the jargon of the art world, “frontality”. There is no attempt to violate the two-dimensional plane – no depth, no perspective; any semi-figurative explanation is robustly prohibited (no empty beach and sky, no cloudscape, here). All evaluation of this type of pure abstract art is reduced to one’s reaction and appreciation – or not – of the colour tones and relationships and the compositional balance or imbalance of the respective blocks of colour. There is nothing wrong with this: pure abstraction, if it is to be appreciated correctly, has to be judged on the strict terms it offers the viewer. To say “that was the colour of the wall in my bedroom when I was a sick child”, or “to me blue equals misery”, or “that reminds me of a sunset in Crete” is redundant. But in Rothko’s case that was never enough. A bombastic, opinionated intellectual, Rothko wanted his simple, extremely beautiful paintings to be freighted with mythic, portentous significance – to be about the despair at the heart of the human condition, doom, entropy, the void and oblivion. Undertaking the Four Seasons commission, he famously declared that he wanted to put all the rich bastards dining there off their food.”


Rothko, ultimately too disturbed by notion of his high-minded work being displayed in a such a banal setting like a restaurant, decided to give back the $35,000 he was paid and refused to have his paintings hung.


3:17pm  |  35 notes   |  rothko |  art |  dyna moe |  red |  modern art 
  1. michellelucida reblogged this from madmenfootnotes and added:
    Mad Men. Huge retrospective currently at...Portland Art Museum.
  2. faithinthegood reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  3. postitoftheday reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  4. monpetitmon reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  5. thalobabyblue reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  6. crazydumbsaint reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  7. kiki-miserychic reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  8. acceptanceworld reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  9. elvira reblogged this from natashavc
  10. natashavc reblogged this from madmenfootnotes and added:
    HEY! MARK ROTHKO! madmenfootnotes:
  11. madmenfootnotes posted this