Sign Up For Sexy Emails
Unbuttoned Twitter

INSIDE

Advertising

Don Draper

Betty Draper

Smoking

Fashion

Booze

Mad Men Bookshelf

Current Events

Frank O'Hara

Art

Peggy

Decor

Mad Men Movie Club

Playlist

John Cheever

Illustrators

BOOK CONTRIBUTORS

Alex Balk, Smoker

Carol Diehl, Art Critic

Matthew Gallaway , Novelist

Megan Lubaszka, Architect 

Angela Serratore, Historian

Tim Siedell, Ad Man

Natasha Simons, Writer

Christina Perry & Derrick Gee, Designers

Dave Wilkie, Ad Man


PALS

A Continuous Lean

A Modernist

Ad Rants

The Awl

Bad Banana 

Basket of Kisses

Charlie Allen

Dyna Moe

Illustration Art

Ivy Style

Make The Logo Bigger

Mid-Century Home Style 

My Vintage Vogue

Mid-Century Illustrated

Today's Inspiration

August 25, 2009
Here’s your Pampers tagline, Pegs.
Pampers = progress.
Take note:
“In the past twenty years, diapers have got smaller and smaller, too. In the early eighties, they were three times bulkier than they are now, thicker and substantially wider in the crotch. But in the mid-eighties Huggies and Procter & Gamble’s Pampers were reduced in bulk by fifty per cent; in the mid-nineties they shrank by a third or so; and in the next few years they may shrink still more. It seems reasonable that there should have been a downside to this, just as there was to the shrinking of cars and radios: how could you reduce the amount of padding in a diaper and not, in some way, compromise its ability to handle an insult? Yet, as diapers got smaller, they got better, and that fact elevates the diaper above nearly all the thousands of other products on the supermarket shelf.” — Malcolm Gladwell, ‘Smaller’. 

Here’s your Pampers tagline, Pegs.

Pampers = progress.

Take note:

“In the past twenty years, diapers have got smaller and smaller, too. In the early eighties, they were three times bulkier than they are now, thicker and substantially wider in the crotch. But in the mid-eighties Huggies and Procter & Gamble’s Pampers were reduced in bulk by fifty per cent; in the mid-nineties they shrank by a third or so; and in the next few years they may shrink still more. It seems reasonable that there should have been a downside to this, just as there was to the shrinking of cars and radios: how could you reduce the amount of padding in a diaper and not, in some way, compromise its ability to handle an insult? Yet, as diapers got smaller, they got better, and that fact elevates the diaper above nearly all the thousands of other products on the supermarket shelf.” — Malcolm Gladwell, ‘Smaller’. 

1:18pm  |  42 notes   |  Advertising 
  1. rachael-maddux reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  2. ballroompink reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  3. mrchapman reblogged this from somethingchanged and added:
    such great copy!
  4. somethingchanged reblogged this from madmenfootnotes
  5. mandertron reblogged this from madmenfootnotes and added:
    I LOVE YOU, MADMENFOOTNOTES!
  6. madmenfootnotes posted this